XBimmers.com | BMW X6 Forum X5 Forum
 
TireRack





Go Back   XBimmers.com | BMW X6 Forum X5 Forum > BMW X5 Forums > General BMW X5 (E70) and X5M Forum (2006-2013)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-15-2009, 07:22 PM   #1
Mark
Administrator
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Drives: 1M
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

Posts: 3,927
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
C/D does it BMW X5M vs Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8, Range Rover Sport and Cayenne TurboS

Name:  small.jpg
Views: 7792
Size:  157.7 KB

BMW X5 M vs. Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8, Land Rover Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

I have to say, this is one amazing lineup of vehicles for a road test. Hats off to Car and Driver magazine for putting this together! You have to read this road test. Here are some select quotes

Quote:
Astoundingly quick, period, come to think of it. The slowest of the lot—if slow is the right word—rumbles to 60 mph in 5.1 seconds.
Quote:
The best EPA ratings belong to the Porsche—12 mpg city
Quote:
BMW and the Porsche achieve comparable chassis rigidity at much lower weight
Quote:
For a vehicle in this weight class, the test-track numbers are simply incredible. But the X5’s responses in the world of fast curves, decreasing radii, and quick transitions are even more so.
The full article and stunning gallery: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mparison_tests

Direct link to the photo gallery: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/..._tests/gallery
__________________
The new beast. BMW M5.
Mark is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-16-2009, 11:24 AM   #2
Vintage
Colonel
 
Vintage's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Z4 35i and 2014 535d x
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Texas

Posts: 2,214
iTrader: (0)

good read and awesome vehicle - the X5 M that is . . .
Vintage is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 10:30 AM   #3
Captain
 
Drives: 991TTs
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Earth

Posts: 977
iTrader: (0)

i never understand why they always put in the range rover, which will always clearly lose (unless if they do some off roading test which it could win), instead of the ML63
1º is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 10:52 AM   #4
Antinontoxic
Lieutenant
 
Antinontoxic's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW Z4 35i DKG M-Sport
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Finland

Posts: 501
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by View Post
i never understand why they always put in the range rover, which will always clearly lose (unless if they do some off roading test which it could win), instead of the ML63
I can't understand what the hell was the Grand Cherokee doing there! It was third only because of the price...
Antinontoxic is offline   Finland
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 11:24 AM   #5
Captain
 
Drives: 991TTs
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Earth

Posts: 977
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antinontoxic View Post
I can't understand what the hell was the Grand Cherokee doing there! It was third only because of the price...
well performance wise i feel like the grand cherokee is MUCH closer to the X5M, Cayenne and ML 63 than the range rover.

i heard the new rovers have made a lot of progress but i own the previous sport supercharged and let me tell you how much of a waste that was, should of went with the regular version, or maybe even something else.
1º is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 11:24 AM   #6
kinan_sleiman2006
Lieutenant
 
kinan_sleiman2006's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW X3
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Syria-Tartous-Banias-po box299

Posts: 572
iTrader: (0)

THE MONSTER X5 M IS AWESOME
kinan_sleiman2006 is offline   Syria
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 12:38 PM   #7
stryker1
Private First Class
 
stryker1's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 2008 M3 silverstone
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami, fl

Posts: 163
iTrader: (2)

I'll tell you why the srt8 was in there.

Its a hell of a vehicle for $43k 0-60 4.4 sec
and it handled slightly above average for a suv.

Reason why i know this is i owned one for a year and just recently traded her in for a 08 m3 E90.

I used to love when guys pulled up beside me in any sportscar and thought they would just leave me standing at the stop light. I gave them a run for their money, and sometimes even won. Yes after 70-80 mph they'd catch up to me but 0-60 i owned them
stryker1 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 12:51 PM   #8
Vintage
Colonel
 
Vintage's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Z4 35i and 2014 535d x
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Texas

Posts: 2,214
iTrader: (0)

the Jeep - for the price, a lot of fun; I have owner two jeep products and liked them
Vintage is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 12:56 PM   #9
Bluechipper
Banned
 
Drives: 09 M3 Vert
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago

Posts: 256
iTrader: (0)

Typical Car & Driver review. The best vehicle gets second because of price.

The Cayenne murdered the X5M in handling tests.
Bluechipper is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 01:48 PM   #10
Captain
 
Drives: 991TTs
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Earth

Posts: 977
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stryker1 View Post
I'll tell you why the srt8 was in there.

Its a hell of a vehicle for $43k 0-60 4.4 sec
and it handled slightly above average for a suv.

Reason why i know this is i owned one for a year and just recently traded her in for a 08 m3 E90.

I used to love when guys pulled up beside me in any sportscar and thought they would just leave me standing at the stop light. I gave them a run for their money, and sometimes even won. Yes after 70-80 mph they'd catch up to me but 0-60 i owned them
i gotta agree, after being owned by a few myself, people just think "oh its american itll never match up" then they get the surprise. all they can say after that is "oh well its still a grand cherokee" GTFOH
1º is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 02:17 PM   #11
Vintage
Colonel
 
Vintage's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Z4 35i and 2014 535d x
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Texas

Posts: 2,214
iTrader: (0)

at some point price has to be a part of the equation; you own an M3 that would be beaten by a 911S in handling but is the 911S at $30k-50k more (depending on options) worth the slight handling increase???
Vintage is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 02:37 PM   #12
stryker1
Private First Class
 
stryker1's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 2008 M3 silverstone
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: miami, fl

Posts: 163
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by VintageBMW View Post
at some point price has to be a part of the equation; you own an M3 that would be beaten by a 911S in handling but is the 911S at $30k-50k more (depending on options) worth the slight handling increase???
IMO I'm at the point where i wont go higher then $50k for a car in this economy.
I earn a good living for the field i'm in, but mr. obama might be putting a damper on that so i will tighten my belt and slow down on my spendings a bit.

I would never pay that much more money for a car which is pretty close in performance. (porsche)

The M3 in comparison to my old srt8 gc is night and day when it comes to overall performance. I do miss the trunk space and my frequent trips to home depot for mulch in the jeep.

The range rover i think doesnt come close to the perfomance of the other three sport utes. Its too top heavy with not enough body (frame) rigidity
The jeep at times was too stiff so when i was at a high speed and went over uneven pavement she used hop to the sides alot.
stryker1 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 04:35 PM   #13
998M
New Member
 
998M's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW M3 and X5M
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Milwaukee

Posts: 24
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluechipper View Post

The Cayenne murdered the X5M in handling tests.
I didn't see this in the article. Did I miss it or are you taking this from somewhere else>
998M is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 04:58 PM   #14
mach330
You don't know JACK!!!
 
mach330's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 X5 35i
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The OC

Posts: 797
iTrader: (3)

Send a message via AIM to mach330 Send a message via Yahoo to mach330
yeah those jeeps are pretty dayam fast.
__________________
Rated /// M
mach330 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 07:29 PM   #15
bavarian19
General
 
bavarian19's Avatar
 
Drives: Car
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VA

Posts: 18,809
iTrader: (23)

bavarian19 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-17-2009, 09:59 PM   #16
zuggerat89
Still waiting...
 
zuggerat89's Avatar
 
Drives: OGV
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Monmouth County, NJ

Posts: 887
iTrader: (0)

They dont like the heavy steering yet they want bigger bolsters? You can't friggin win with these people... hahaha.
zuggerat89 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-18-2009, 12:37 AM   #17
Berduderunner
drk one
 
Berduderunner's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 135i
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tampa/Orlando

Posts: 792
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 e90 335i  [0.00]
2008 135i  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to Berduderunner
woah... thats EXACTLY what my 1 runs in the 1/4

12.5 @ 112

INSANE!
__________________
Jet Black | Coral | HighGlossBlack | Steptronic | Premium | Sport | Comfort | ActiveSteering | Navi | HiFi | HD | iPod | SAT
BMS JB3 v2.0 | BMS DCI | Berk Tech Sport Exhaust | UR * DPs | CoolingMist Meth Kit w/ CMGS | H&R OE Sport Springs | Breyton GTS-R | Dunlop Direzza Sport Z1 Star Specs | GP Thunder 8000K Low Beams/Angel Eyes/Cornering Lights | LED Interior Light Kit | Window Tint | Smoked Tail Lights | Smoked License Plate Cover
Berduderunner is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-18-2009, 08:30 AM   #18
vitaman
New Member
 
Drives: BMW X5M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA

Posts: 26
iTrader: (0)

"Typical Car & Driver review. The best vehicle gets second because of price.
The Cayenne murdered the X5M in handling tests."
Not sure where you got this.
Edmunds test of the Cayenne TurboS: Slalom (mph)
66.2
Skid Pad Leteral acceleration (g)
0.89
Their test of the X6M (they have not tested X5M but results should be very similar):
Slalom (mph)
68.6
Skid Pad Leteral acceleration (g)
0.91
vitaman is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-18-2009, 10:12 AM   #19
Vintage
Colonel
 
Vintage's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Z4 35i and 2014 535d x
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Texas

Posts: 2,214
iTrader: (0)

some people just love to post on BMW sites but yet long for a Porsche - confusing as always but more common than I would have believed
Vintage is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      12-19-2009, 01:43 AM   #20
Bluechipper
Banned
 
Drives: 09 M3 Vert
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago

Posts: 256
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 998M View Post
I didn't see this in the article. Did I miss it or are you taking this from somewhere else>
Cayenne Turbo S
Lane change- 66.0 mph
Skipad- 0.91g
Braking- 158 feet

X5M
Lane change- 63.3 mph
Skipad- 0.89g
braking- 162 feet


The X5M just beats the Cayenne in the 1/4 by .1, same mph.

But after 1/4 mile the Cayenne Tubo pulls ahead, with a quicker 0-130mph.

http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...c5c9b30d35.pdf


Like I said the best performance full-size suv gets second because of price. (Bonus, it can off-road like a range rover.)
Bluechipper is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-19-2009, 05:58 AM   #21
991GT3
Captain
 
991GT3's Avatar
 
Drives: Cayenne Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

Posts: 738
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluechipper View Post
Cayenne Turbo S
Lane change- 66.0 mph
Skipad- 0.91g
Braking- 158 feet

X5M
Lane change- 63.3 mph
Skipad- 0.89g
braking- 162 feet


The X5M just beats the Cayenne in the 1/4 by .1, same mph.

But after 1/4 mile the Cayenne Tubo pulls ahead, with a quicker 0-130mph.

http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...c5c9b30d35.pdf


Like I said the best performance full-size suv gets second because of price. (Bonus, it can off-road like a range rover.)

How do you figure? CD had the total points gap at 16 and the price difference was only 4 of those. Couple that with the fact that skid pad numbers are usually dubious and the braking numbers were only slightly better because of the outrageously priced ceramic brake option.
__________________
-2011 Cayenne Turbo
-2012 Cayenne Turbo
-2013 VelociRaptor 600
991GT3 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      12-19-2009, 11:01 AM   #22
vitaman
New Member
 
Drives: BMW X5M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA

Posts: 26
iTrader: (0)

Bottom line here.....both are amazing vehicles with spectacular handling and great brute force. Although the X5M ain't cheap, unless you are looking for off road capability, the BMW comes off as excellent value.
vitaman is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.




xbimmers
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST