XBimmers.com | BMW X6 Forum X5 Forum
 
TireRack





Go Back   XBimmers.com | BMW X6 Forum X5 Forum > BMW X5 Forums > General BMW X5 (E70) and X5M Forum (2006-2013)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-24-2015, 11:52 AM   #1
KWMN33
New Member
1
Rep
5
Posts

Drives: 2013 X5 35i Premium
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Minnesota

iTrader: (0)

Octane question from a newbie!

Just purchased a 2013 X5 35i Premium yesterday. My first ever Bimmer!

Quick question - and certainly there don't seem to be a shortage of threads about this, but wanted to ask specifically as it pertains to the X5:

Our local gas stations don't seem to have 91 Octane (the BMW recommended fuel) as often as they have a combo of 89 and 92/93. Is the wisest course of action to:

A) Always fill with 92/93 octane if there is no 91?
B) Always bill with 89 octane (it's just fine for this particular engine)
C) alternate between 89 and 93 (in theory, it evens out to 91!)
D) seek out gas stations that actually have 91 and just stick to using them

Any advice would be great!
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 11:56 AM   #2
m5 guy
Brigadier General
m5 guy's Avatar
United_States
1662
Rep
3,198
Posts

Drives: 2020 M5 Comp
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hawaii

iTrader: (14)

92/93. It will be better for your engine. 91 is the minimum required.
__________________
2020 F90 M5 Comp Oxford Green Metallic II-Aragon JOURNAL
2016 F10 M5 Space Gray-Black SOLD
2012 E70 X5M Monte Carlo Blue-Silverstone SOLD
2001 E46 M3 Oxford Green Metallic II-Cinnamon SOLD
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 12:16 PM   #3
KWMN33
New Member
1
Rep
5
Posts

Drives: 2013 X5 35i Premium
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Minnesota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m3 guy View Post
92/93. It will be better for your engine. 91 is the minimum required.
Oh... my manual said 89 is the minimum required. Is that something that's generally changed over the past 2-3 years?
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 12:21 PM   #4
P1
Lieutenant General
P1's Avatar
11542
Rep
11,128
Posts

Drives: 2004 3/4 ton Duramax
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United States

iTrader: (1)

Option A... I think minimum is 91.
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 02:03 PM   #5
KayTees
Tuned ///M Cars Only
KayTees's Avatar
Canada
139
Rep
334
Posts

Drives: '21 F87 M2C |'20 F97 X3MC
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver BC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Mine says Minimum 89 but in Canada, I tried a little experiment, I put in a maybe a bar Chevron 94, drove it around and it felt normal, put Shells 91 and I drove it around for a bit, it felt sluggish and completely different. That's just me tho, the proper way is to probably dyno it.
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 03:06 PM   #6
goodmaj
Private First Class
21
Rep
146
Posts

Drives: 2014 E63S Wagon
Join Date: May 2014
Location: St. Louis

iTrader: (0)

I've found that the biggest difference is if you can get gas without ethanol. If you can, there's your new best friend. Otherwise, stick with 93.
__________________
Too many BMWs to count....wife is driving a 2016 F15 X5d and I sold my X5 for an E63S Wagon.
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 03:21 PM   #7
serge1
First Lieutenant
United_States
32
Rep
389
Posts

Drives: X5 35d
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 BMW X5 35d  [0.00]
More octane -> gas is less explosive -> allows more compression -> more "bang" once finally ignited.
Modern engine computers are able to adapt to octane levels in fuel. The engine will be fine, just less power, that's all.
Appreciate 0
      11-24-2015, 03:26 PM   #8
Klimo
New Member
0
Rep
28
Posts

Drives: 2012 X5 50i
Join Date: May 2014
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KayTees View Post
Mine says Minimum 89 but in Canada, I tried a little experiment, I put in a maybe a bar Chevron 94, drove it around and it felt normal, put Shells 91 and I drove it around for a bit, it felt sluggish and completely different. That's just me tho, the proper way is to probably dyno it.
Octane rating has absolutely no impact on power output. Only if you put in octane that is not recommended for your engine. If 91 is recommended, then putting in 94 makes no difference.
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2015, 12:34 PM   #9
KWMN33
New Member
1
Rep
5
Posts

Drives: 2013 X5 35i Premium
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Minnesota

iTrader: (0)

So if 91 is recommended, then putting in 94 is totally fine (but putting in 89 isn't ideal?) Just want to clarify. Thank you all for the helpful answers!
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2015, 07:19 PM   #10
theaudir8fan
Lieutenant
theaudir8fan's Avatar
Canada
34
Rep
472
Posts

Drives: a major headache
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: lonely land up north

iTrader: (1)

I would say always go for 92/93 on premium cars, don't cheap out on gas. If you want to track down, try getting fuel that doesn't contain ethanol


Quote:
Originally Posted by KayTees View Post
Mine says Minimum 89 but in Canada, I tried a little experiment, I put in a maybe a bar Chevron 94, drove it around and it felt normal, put Shells 91 and I drove it around for a bit, it felt sluggish and completely different. That's just me tho, the proper way is to probably dyno it.
I completely disagree with you, the Chevron 94 simply doesn't feel up to par as Shell's 91. From my personal observation, the Chevron 94 in BC get an average of more than 35kms less of range from a tank and it doesn't perform as well on track. I know someone with a M4 who get around 5mph slower trap speed in the 1/4 at castrol on 94 compare to Shell 91. He also works for a machining company that does servicing for the refineries and says that Chevron's standards is simply not up to par compare with the others
Appreciate 0
      11-25-2015, 10:49 PM   #11
Flying Ace
Lieutenant General
Flying Ace's Avatar
4983
Rep
11,891
Posts

Drives: G05 45e, 997.1 & 991.1 GT3s
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SF, CA

iTrader: (5)

I put diesel in mine. But not recommended for you
Appreciate 1
      11-26-2015, 04:53 AM   #12
KayTees
Tuned ///M Cars Only
KayTees's Avatar
Canada
139
Rep
334
Posts

Drives: '21 F87 M2C |'20 F97 X3MC
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver BC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klimo View Post
Octane rating has absolutely no impact on power output. Only if you put in octane that is not recommended for your engine. If 91 is recommended, then putting in 94 makes no difference.
Never said there was a gain in power, I just said that when I have 94 then go back to Shells 91, the car just feels more sluggish.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2015, 08:39 AM   #13
Poppyboy
Captain
United_States
192
Rep
827
Posts

Drives: 2011 X5 3.5i w/ SA Package
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lincolnshire, IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1976 Triumph TR6  [10.00]
1993 Bentley Turbo R  [10.00]
2011 X5  [10.00]
Just filled up with Mobil 93 last night at 2.99/gal. What a deal! I rarely see 91 available in the Chicago area.
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2015, 12:44 PM   #14
UglyBuzzard
Colonel
UglyBuzzard's Avatar
United_States
6354
Rep
2,329
Posts

Drives: F90 / M5
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

In CA we get 91 - what would be affect by adding octane boost?
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2015, 02:45 PM   #15
SlowBucksE70
New Member
SlowBucksE70's Avatar
7
Rep
23
Posts

Drives: Bmw X5 50i M Sport
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: union County New Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poppyboy
Just filled up with Mobil 93 last night at 2.99/gal. What a deal! I rarely see 91 available in the Chicago area.
Wow
BP 93 octane in jersey is $2.23cash and credit.. BP rewards help as well
__________________
SlowBucksE70
Appreciate 0
      11-26-2015, 10:43 PM   #16
Poppyboy
Captain
United_States
192
Rep
827
Posts

Drives: 2011 X5 3.5i w/ SA Package
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lincolnshire, IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1976 Triumph TR6  [10.00]
1993 Bentley Turbo R  [10.00]
2011 X5  [10.00]
I couldn't fathom ever using BP after what they did to the gulf.
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2015, 03:01 PM   #17
heatmizr
Captain
United_States
152
Rep
707
Posts

Drives: E70 X5 50i M-Sport
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC

iTrader: (0)

PoppyBoy wrote:
"I couldn't fathom ever using BP after what they did to the gulf. "


Well then you better avoid Exxon as well, for decimating 1000 miles of pristine Alaskan shoreline...
http://www.theatlantic.com/photo/201...-today/100703/
Actually make that Exxon-Mobil - they merged in 1998.

Your options may reduce further as you do more research...
Its guys like us, though, with X5s that drive the need for oil to travel around the world

I'm with the poster above who suggested looking for NO ETHANOL above all else. Ethanol is detrimental to lots of stuff! I want to avoid it at all costs ESPECIALLY for motorcycles and older model vehicles. But it's in the gas freaking everywhere...
Also, at the ONLY station near me that has/had ethanol-free, the price jumped up to $1.50-2.00 higher than any other octane choice. I complained to the owner and he said the parent company he franchised from controlled it, nothing he could do.

Second, I highly recommend checking out Top Tier Gas:http://www.toptiergas.com/
It's a shame not more people have heard of this. Lots of smaller brands listed here; though PLS NOTE you MAY need to purchase the Premium fuel offered to get the Top Tier offering.
BMW is the first manufacturer listed here supporting this fuel rating.
Unfortunately Top Tier does not necessarily mean no ethanol...

This article speaks of Shell specifically (V-Power!), also mentions BMW at the end - and that apparently Shell gave away 100 BMWs earlier this year?? How did I miss that?!
http://thechronicleherald.ca/wheelsn...e-a-difference
__________________
heatmizr [Todd]
g26 i4 e40 - Clean Machine
e70 X5 50i M-Sport "The Boss" Loaded
e90 328i - sold
e36 M3 - Gone to become a track star
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2015, 03:21 PM   #18
goodmaj
Private First Class
21
Rep
146
Posts

Drives: 2014 E63S Wagon
Join Date: May 2014
Location: St. Louis

iTrader: (0)

Interesting that Costco is on the top tier list but not Sam's.
__________________
Too many BMWs to count....wife is driving a 2016 F15 X5d and I sold my X5 for an E63S Wagon.
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2015, 03:53 PM   #19
JGard
Private First Class
77
Rep
128
Posts

Drives: 24 BMW iX xDrive50
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: MA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KWMN33 View Post
So if 91 is recommended, then putting in 94 is totally fine (but putting in 89 isn't ideal?) Just want to clarify. Thank you all for the helpful answers!
Due to the timing and compression level of an engine, the octane ratings make a difference in whether or not you can damage your engine more than anything.

So if it calls for a minimum of something, it's because that level of gasoline won't pre-ignite (meaning it won't explode before the spark plug tells it to) under that engine's ideal running conditions. Prolonged detonation/knock will absolutely destroy an engine. Ironically, diesels actually are made to run this way (no spark plugs) and it's part of why diesel engines can last so long compared to gas counterparts.

As someone mentioned, most cars today can sense when that's happening (they have something called a knock sensor) and will retard the timing of the engine to eliminate that problem. The result of retarded timing is less power and often less efficiency.

So while in the very short term some bad gas could "hurt" your engine, the car's ECU will notice and adjust accordingly.
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2015, 03:53 PM   #20
Flying Ace
Lieutenant General
Flying Ace's Avatar
4983
Rep
11,891
Posts

Drives: G05 45e, 997.1 & 991.1 GT3s
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SF, CA

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poppyboy View Post
I couldn't fathom ever using BP after what they did to the gulf.
you're a good candidate for a bicycle as a primary mode of transport.

every oil company has had issues in the past, evironmental and political.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2015, 03:55 PM   #21
Poppyboy
Captain
United_States
192
Rep
827
Posts

Drives: 2011 X5 3.5i w/ SA Package
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lincolnshire, IL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1976 Triumph TR6  [10.00]
1993 Bentley Turbo R  [10.00]
2011 X5  [10.00]
Yeah, but few so blatantly criminal as BP.
Appreciate 0
      12-01-2015, 04:13 PM   #22
P1
Lieutenant General
P1's Avatar
11542
Rep
11,128
Posts

Drives: 2004 3/4 ton Duramax
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United States

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poppyboy View Post
Just filled up with Mobil 93 last night at 2.99/gal. What a deal! I rarely see 91 available in the Chicago area.
I filled up over Thanksgiving for $1.89 a gallon. And that was for 93.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.




xbimmers
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST