11-30-2017, 10:14 AM | #1 |
Private
3
Rep 65
Posts |
CARFAX Reports
A while back I had some very minor front bumper damage in a parking garage which caused a small crack & dent around the front reflector. The damage was maybe about a 1/4 golf ball size indentation and cracked the housing for the reflector.
I went to a couple smaller mom & pop auto body shops in my area to get a couple quotes on what it would take to repair it. The larger shops typically quoted out a new bumper (~$2K), while the smaller shops were comfortable with patching (~$450). Being that the damage wasn't sever or noticeable enough to really bother me I left it be for the time being. Fast forward a couple months (to now), while looking to trade the car in, one of the dealers informed me that I had an accident on my Carfax record. Obviously shocked since the car has ever been in an accident, I boiled it down the the ESTIMATES that I got for the front bumper. Insurance was never involved and work was never done on the vehicle. I contacted all of the shops which are all admit that they do not report to Carfax. I've also been in contact with Carfax who claim that too much of the data fits my car so they can not remove it. After a little research I've discovered that Carfax data mines, in which they pay companies for your information, not a huge shocker, but being that most auto body shops use the same software to run numbers for quotes it makes it fairly easy for Carfax obtain it. This erks me a lot since they do not provide any further details on the "damage". *PSA* So regardless of the severity of the damage, or whether you go through insurance or not, or even if you decide not to get the work done, Carfax can pull that information and mark it on your vehicles records. Now for my dilemma... Do I get the work done or not before trading in the car? Is it better to have the car looking it best to eliminate any dealer leverage, OR leave it as is since the mark is already on the Carfax report and the dealers going to f#$* me anyways for trading it in? Last edited by RustyX5M; 11-30-2017 at 11:05 AM.. |
11-30-2017, 11:19 AM | #2 |
Captain
344
Rep 728
Posts |
That’s shitty. I assumed shops automatically reported it or insurance did but I’ve have vehicles in actual accidents that never got reported to car fax. I’ve also purchased a vehicle with a clean carfax then tried to trade into BMW a couple years later only to find out that the accident the previous owner had was reported a year after I got the car...wtf. BMW wouldn’t take the trade in since they say they can’t sell a vehicle without a clean car fax. They offered junk value to sell at auction and I ended up selling private party for five times their offer.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2017, 12:27 PM | #3 | |
Private
3
Rep 65
Posts |
Quote:
Every body shop I talked to despises Carfax, and were completely unaware that their records were getting sold (or so they claimed). Though I'm sure they all signed the agreement when they registered the software that discloses the information. It's definitely a double edged sword, though just feels shady that they are reporting small estimates without documentation or consent on my behalf. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2017, 12:41 PM | #4 |
Captain
194
Rep 828
Posts
Drives: 2011 X5 3.5i w/ SA Package
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lincolnshire, IL
|
Carfax is the most evil enterprise in existence today, operating with total impunity. I’ve been screwed over numerous times, including them reporting a prior owner’s accident damage two years after I bought the car and three years after the accident. You have no realistic choice but to sell privately, and stay away from the scumbags in the business who offer you crap for your trade-in.
Last edited by Poppyboy; 11-30-2017 at 12:44 PM.. Reason: Typo |
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2017, 11:42 PM | #6 |
Captain
194
Rep 828
Posts
Drives: 2011 X5 3.5i w/ SA Package
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lincolnshire, IL
|
Unfortunately, Carfax is the go-to vehicle history report for the industry, regardless of accuracy. If you have a car with any negative info, you’re toast, at least from a trade-in standpoint. Your only choices to sell your car will be 1. take the 30%+ hit on trade 2. sell your car privately or 3. be buried in it. Check out certain auctions on Bring-a-Trailer to see how sellers get crucified because of negative info on a Carfax report.
Last edited by Poppyboy; 11-30-2017 at 11:45 PM.. Reason: Typo |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2017, 10:45 PM | #7 | |
Private
3
Rep 65
Posts |
Quote:
What I have a hard time getting past, through my numerous conversations & complaints with Carfax, is the fact that they can not provide me proof of their claims for "confidentiality" reasons. Which I find complete BS since its my car which they are pulling info from and representing without my permission. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2017, 10:57 PM | #8 |
Colonel
886
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Shouldn't matter to much as it would say the damage is superficial. Even Bmw can sell a bmw as a CPO with warranty even if it's been in a small accident that didn't cause any harm to the structure.
My old 2006 CPO z4 has a carfax that showed front end damage but was superficial. Was fixed and BMW CPO'd the car and I bought it and the dealer gave me a great trade in price when I bought my 135is from them. If their was any structure damage that would give you a big red mark. Dealers that use the superficial ascendent to give you thousands less are just lousy dealers. It should effect you maybe a couple hundred max. When my 135is I had was hit in the rear, just a new bumper and repaint which was on carfax when I traded it in and my trade was the same as If it was not in a wreck. Dealer told me they just wont deal with serious wrecks or if airbags where deployed. But they had a buyer lined up anyway so no skin off their back. If that dealer won't play ball find another one. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2017, 08:41 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1628
Rep 1,727
Posts |
Well here's an interesting point. I've been considering getting my front bumper and side fender flares repainted due to rock chips... Is this something my shop may report to carfax?? such bullshit, i've never heard of anything being reported besides police reports
__________________
2017 C63 2012 X5M SOLD: 2015 M3; 2007 X3 M Sport; 2014 X3 M Sport 35i; 2004 X5 4.4i; 1994 325i |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2017, 09:42 AM | #10 | |
Private
3
Rep 65
Posts |
Quote:
I can't imagine rock chip touch-ups would go on your Carfax. ...then again, I didn't think estimates would either. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2017, 10:10 AM | #11 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1628
Rep 1,727
Posts |
Quote:
I always carry a paint thickness meter to determine if a car has been repainted or not, you can tell a lot more with that.
__________________
2017 C63 2012 X5M SOLD: 2015 M3; 2007 X3 M Sport; 2014 X3 M Sport 35i; 2004 X5 4.4i; 1994 325i |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2017, 11:55 AM | #12 |
Captain
194
Rep 828
Posts
Drives: 2011 X5 3.5i w/ SA Package
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lincolnshire, IL
|
The only other thing I can think of to mitigate an accident being reported is to have documentation up the wazoo which reconciles the work done as minor, matching the referenced date. Even then, many dealers will still try to murder you with their offer, as it’s a “story” requiring explanation. Try to divorce the logical explanation from your line of thinking, and that’s what these dealerships are using against you. Bad people.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2017, 11:32 AM | #13 |
Major
460
Rep 1,025
Posts
Drives: Mein F Fünfundachtzig Einhorn
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: RIP Florian Schneider-Esleben
|
Carfax Reports Can't Be Used as Evidence in Court
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cult...ports-hearsay/ |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|