08-31-2018, 11:24 AM | #1 |
Cheapskate
4450
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Distance to Empty consistently innacurate
So I've had my E70 for a few months now and I have noticed a bizarre trend. Every time I fill up my tank, it reports ~430 miles to empty. This plummets as I drive the car, and by the time it says 50 miles to empty I have only driven ~300 miles. This happens every. single. time.
The only thing I have noticed is that 2 of the belly pans are missing under the engine/subframe. I'm not sure why or how (I bought the car used, whatever), but I bought replacements. I still don't see how this would affect the car's estimated mpg not adapting after this long. Thoughts? |
08-31-2018, 05:05 PM | #5 |
Cheapskate
4450
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Ok I wasn't sure if it was normal or not. I've never had a car be that persistent that it could get 75+ miles to a tank more than it has, as far as I know, ever gotten. All I do is reset the trip mileage every time I fill up and watch that, but weird that it can't seem to calibrate itself. And of course, the long term mpg always says 17+mpg when 350 miles to a tank is closer to 15. Now it feels like the 3.0si wasn't even worth it, but I guess that's just the drawback of a large suv. Next time I'll just get the V8 so I can enjoy it at least haha.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-13-2018, 10:24 AM | #6 |
Registered
0
Rep 3
Posts |
That sounds really low for a tank. I have the 3.0d but use it entirely on country/urban roads and get 500 ish to a tank (or would if it didn't get iffy at the quarter tank mark). After a reset the estimated mpg climbs slowely to around 27miles per gallon. Are you sure you haven't got a leak?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-15-2018, 09:17 AM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
131
Rep 310
Posts |
Mine does the same thing, I just know that I am generally needing to fill at around 300 per tank, and I always reset trip odo. when I fill up. Maybe doing a long freeway drive, all downhill, with a tailwind the whole time it could get closer to 400 haha.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2018, 07:22 AM | #8 |
Cheapskate
4450
Rep 4,993
Posts |
So I forgot to upgrade this thread, but I did a few things to try and improve fuel economy.
I remembered that I did a vehicle inspection at BMW after purchasing the car, and they found several underbody panels were missing. I realized that could be affecting fuel economy. So I bought all of them used on ebay and installed them. I've seen a slight gain but haven't gone through a whole tank to really see if there's a difference. I'm not sure why the previous owner removed them, but I think they'll be very helpful for smoothing air going under the car and reducing drag. I still need a few more fasteners to complete everything but they're on order now. We'll see how the mileage looks after going through a few tanks. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2018, 08:01 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
230
Rep 551
Posts
Drives: 2018 M5 / 2011 X5 35d
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Houston TX
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2018, 05:07 PM | #10 |
Major General
4446
Rep 7,488
Posts |
Dont' forget to take topography (lots of hills (Cincy) vs mostly flat land (Houston), the type of traffic/road conditions being driven. Perhpas the AVG MPH should be listed along with the AVG MPG because this would give another indication of why the avg MPG may be higher or lower.
A lower avg MPH will have a lower avg MPG and vice versa. If you are only getting 28 MPH on average vs someone that is getting 35 MPH on average...the latter will also have a higher avg MPG. It may also be due to longer idle times in urban traffic vs someone driving on well timed interstate and long boulevard/parkways with timed lights.
__________________
2015 F06 650ix Gran Coupe`(Moonstone/Cohiba Brown)| 2014 F15 X5 50i MSport (Space Gray/Mocha)
Become a BMW CCA member! Click HERE to join and feel free to use my BMW CCA member #191509 as a referral. |
Appreciate
1
kern4174449.50 |
10-17-2018, 03:50 AM | #11 | |
Cheapskate
4450
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 08:37 AM | #12 |
Major General
4446
Rep 7,488
Posts |
Ah yes...I love long road trips when you get to travel at consistent speeds with little braking. Please do post back what your highway avg MPG was on this trip...it will be interesting to see the difference.
__________________
2015 F06 650ix Gran Coupe`(Moonstone/Cohiba Brown)| 2014 F15 X5 50i MSport (Space Gray/Mocha)
Become a BMW CCA member! Click HERE to join and feel free to use my BMW CCA member #191509 as a referral. |
Appreciate
1
kern4174449.50 |
10-17-2018, 09:29 AM | #13 | |
Lieutenant
230
Rep 551
Posts
Drives: 2018 M5 / 2011 X5 35d
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Houston TX
|
Quote:
Your 600 mile trip will be a good way to test and see. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 10:09 AM | #14 | |
Lieutenant
78
Rep 491
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 11:48 AM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
232
Rep 313
Posts
Drives: 2006 325xi
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Omaha
|
City driving is a mpg killer - especially with stoplights, traffic & such
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 12:29 PM | #17 |
i'm just saying
5749
Rep 2,634
Posts |
that range is being constantly being calculated by the car according to speed, driving style.. basically how far you travel with how much fuel.. thats the reason kern..
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 01:35 PM | #18 |
Lieutenant
230
Rep 551
Posts
Drives: 2018 M5 / 2011 X5 35d
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Houston TX
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 01:39 PM | #19 |
First Lieutenant
55
Rep 337
Posts
Drives: 2010 X6 M
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: 6ix Side
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2018, 01:59 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant
230
Rep 551
Posts
Drives: 2018 M5 / 2011 X5 35d
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Houston TX
|
agree 100% on my 35d I get on average 25-26 MPG.. that's about 60% highway 40% city.. and trust me.. here in Houston there is a lot of stop and go traffic.. even on the highway.. I still squeeze a good 500 miles per tank.
Long distance trips cruising at 70-75 MPH with little to no stopping gives me about 600-650 miles... somewhere I read somebody getting close to 700 on a single tank.. had to be under the absolute perfect ideal conditions and running on fumes at the end. BTW.. I made a mistake, seem like to have a monster X6M not a 5 .. yes.. I'm jealous!! |
Appreciate
1
do_0b54.50 |
10-22-2018, 09:49 AM | #21 |
Private First Class
31
Rep 189
Posts |
There isn’t anything to do with my maintenance. It’s been over done. I get same mileage from my old motor with has more tha 50k hours on it and this motor that only has 35k km on it after the original one blew. Back in 2012 when I was 16 I can’t afford a X5M so I have to use all my oil field earned cash to finance a 35d, which is a very rare one since it has 3rd row seat and cooled seat, basically every single option is ticked except M sport cause it looks stupid back then. I have been driving it like a X5M, running through a set of tire in like 60 months, go to track day destroying Honda civics, delivering equipment and stuff for oil field and leave the car running for more than 2 weeks because 35d won’t start back up in -45C weather. I made it from Calgary to Montréal in 30hours so now you kinda know how I drive my 35d, more like a M3 than a X5..... I am trading it in for a Cayenne turbo S or potentially a X7M or a M760Li, my car USB sitting in my garage till it’s get traded, taking my 89’ town car as a daily now. I will post my vin then you guys know don’t buy this VIN
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2018, 03:28 PM | #22 |
Cheapskate
4450
Rep 4,993
Posts |
So I think the trip went well. Granted I had the family + trunk full of luggage, but both ways I got upwards of 18-19mpg. That's a lot better than the 15 I was making, and the mountains in tennessee/north georgia killed my mileage fast. I think I could get 20+ if the roads stayed flat, or even with the highway traffic on my normal commute when it's only me in the car.
It still doesn't fix the gauge inaccuracy though. One time I filled up and it estimated 480 miles to empty that would be amazing, but I got nowhere close lol. I also replaced the battery before the trip which I believe reset all the running calculations. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|