|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-24-2011, 09:58 AM | #1 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 30
Posts |
2011 RENNTECH BMW X5M sets record as World’s Fastest “TUNE ONLY” X5M
Those times are E60 M5 territory.
Quote:
|
|
|
10-24-2011, 06:31 PM | #2 |
Private
11
Rep 51
Posts |
It is indeed a very strong 1/4 mile time, but the difference in the two r/t's (reaction times) implies that the Renntech gains aren't as significant as one would think.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2011, 09:38 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant
44
Rep 567
Posts |
Throw in catless Dp's and an Akra exhaust, larger air box and check those numbers out!
__________________
| '10 Escalade ESV | '12 Audi S4 | '01 Audi S4 | '15 328d Xdrive M-Sportwagon |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2011, 09:55 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
33
Rep 576
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2011, 10:35 PM | #6 | |
Private First Class
6
Rep 130
Posts |
Quote:
R/T has nothing to do with ET or MPH Reation Time is based on the time it takes you to break the starting line beam once the tree goes green. You can sit there for 1 minutes and your ET/MPH will still be the same The Renntech tuned X was almost 7 tenths faster and and 5.55 MPH faster That is an alot. The comparision is flawed since there are some fast X5M and some not as fast X5M. The best test would be to to test a truck stock, load the tune and test it again. Not use two different trucks. Personally the 113 MPH is kind of low. But considering it is humid Florida air, it may be ok. I have seen 119+ MPH in colder weather(in the 40s)
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2011, 11:43 PM | #7 | |
Private First Class
11
Rep 102
Posts |
Quote:
You can get a very good estimate of rear wheel horsepower by using: horsepower=weight(velocity/234)^3 Using this equation, the Renntech X5M made 624 horsepower and the stock X5M made 535. There are limitations to this. If either driver lifts just as the cross the line, they will keep their ET the same; but, their MPH will be slightly lower. (Most tracks have the speed trap after the finish line.) You need to know that both drivers stayed in it after the line to get a good calculation. Either way, it appears that Renntech made nearly 90 more horsepower with only a tune. That is very respectable. I used a weight of 5,500 lbs,5300 vehicle+200 lbs driver. You can also calculate hoserpower as horsepower=weight/(ET/5.825)^3 Last edited by Brian425; 10-25-2011 at 11:50 PM.. Reason: Correction |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2011, 11:04 AM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
27
Rep 304
Posts |
I agree the reaction time has nothing to do with the trap speed and E/T. It pretty much just telling about the traction and amount of wheel spins. I would like to see the difference between the ESS tune and Renntech.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2011, 06:34 PM | #9 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 30
Posts |
Quote:
At what drag strip you have seen an X5M trap 119+ mph in cold weather and where is the time slip/video? I'd love to see it. Also, what mods were on the X5M that allegedly trapped 119+ plus. I hope this isn't another VBox nonsense fish tale. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2011, 07:21 PM | #10 |
Private First Class
11
Rep 102
Posts |
I don't think 119 is out of the question. A tune, down pipe, exhaust, intercooler, lighter rims and tires are all relatively easy mods. Gears would really wake up the big truck.
If some one did bigger turbos, injectors, ported heads, etc, etc... It could really put up some impressive numbers. We all know, HP (to a large degree) is just about how much you have to spend. Last edited by Brian425; 10-28-2011 at 08:01 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-29-2011, 09:30 AM | #11 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 30
Posts |
Quote:
I don't disagree that 119 is possible. However, I posted a video of a tune only X5M going a little over 113.3 mph against a stock X5M which went 107 mph on the same day at the same track next to each other. In fact, the white Renntech X5M just ran over 114 mph other night since the tune was modified. DonHo believes that 113.3 is a little low since he has heard of X5Ms trapping over 119. I call bullshit for a tune only truck. Moreover, I have yet to see an X5M trap 119 and I've been looking. There is a heavily modified PPP X6M with no cats only running 116 mph. In short, I was just wondering were he got his 119 from. In no way was it a tune only X5M (unless it had a 200 shot) and I haven"t seen a modified one go that fast. Just looking for the tune only unicorn he is talking about since he said 113.3 is low. The white truck in the video will be getting more mods, and we hope to get it to trap 119+. But its going to need more than a tune. Last edited by BMWSR; 10-29-2011 at 09:38 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2011, 07:09 AM | #12 |
Private First Class
11
Rep 102
Posts |
Sorry, I missed the tune only. You are 100% correct.
I am very new to BMW's (the X5 50i is my first); but, I've been around drag racing and cars for 20 years. I am impressed with such large gains with only a tune. What are the plans for the next mods? How fast do you hope to see the X5M go? I am curious how fast it can go and still remain comfortably streetable. Obviously 11's at 115 is very realistic goal. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2011, 01:54 PM | #13 |
Private
2
Rep 59
Posts |
This is funny.. You may want to see how times are calculated at the drag strip. rt has nothing to do with your actual time.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2011, 09:46 PM | #14 | |
Private First Class
6
Rep 130
Posts |
Quote:
Not a Vbox, but a Passport GT2. before you laugh, let me explain. The truck bone stock in warmer weather ran 12.7@109 on the gt2 I added the ESS Tune. It went 116+, then in cooler weather in the 40s, it posted a 119+ MPH Now you can say the box is crap or inaccurate or whatever. But here is what happened. The truck started feeling sluggish. I pulled the tune and sent it to the dealer where the found some problems in the air pumps for the compressors. they fixed the issue and I got the truck back I took the truck to Atco dragway and ran it in the stock tune and since it was a dragster event i had only two passes. Temps were in the low 50s. I messed up the LC on the first pass due to a pro tree. On the second pass it posted a 12.5@113(funny, same MPH as your renntech tune???) I came home that night, waited till my test highway was clear, set up my GT2 and made a pass. On the GT2 it showed 12.49@112.8 So according to that same night data, I would say my Gt2 is pretty dammed close to dragstrip times. I tried loading the ESS tune during the next week and it would not take. I tried it again and now I am in the process of having ESS send me an entire new tune. They reset my DF and we are doing the entire process over again My truck has factory exhaust and only a tune(used to have one) and a set of drop in K&Ns cry bullshit all you want, but once I get my tune back, I would be willing to travel down south and we could head down to HOH in SC and we can race Heads up. Find a DP man and we could lock up 1000 for 5000 or better and I will travel to you. as long as you do not have NOS, we have a race and I will show you what a dud you own I might be down there for a grudge race next weekend, so if I get the tune problem solved we can do it that soon. Lets see if I have the 119 unicorn.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 10:22 AM | #15 |
Private First Class
11
Rep 102
Posts |
We all know Atco is downhill. You can skip Cecil County too, another downhill track.
Sorry too easy to pass up. Atco is a good track that is flat and fast. I don't know if Cecil County is downhill. Both are just old rumors that never die. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 07:28 PM | #16 |
Captain
105
Rep 806
Posts |
Wow! I am really interested about you saying that your truck felt sluggish. I am experiencing that too. At the beginning of the year I snapped off a few 12.60's at the track then went on a 600km road trip. On my return it felt very sluggish, very laggy. Backed up my suspicion at the track with 13.1's to 13.4's and the DA was better than my 12.60 runs. I took it to the dealership, they found a low boost CEL and could not explain why the truck felt slow.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 08:22 PM | #17 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 130
Posts |
I have been to Cecil many times. The drive is actually about the same for me. and Cecil is like a circle track with all the runs you can make. One of my favorite is Cecil. I also ran my grudge car the fastest at Cecil.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 08:28 PM | #18 | |
Private First Class
6
Rep 130
Posts |
Quote:
But even bone stock, I know I can still go 113MPH Hopefully we can figure this out before it snows again and I can make it to Etown. You ever seen a "unicorn" run??!!
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 09:49 PM | #19 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 30
Posts |
Quote:
What a bunch of bullshit. Who do you expect to believe that nonsense? Who are channeling with your psuedo hood babble -Vanilla Ice? A ton of words and no timeslip? WTF. Why don't you have a time slip with 119 mph on it, or even 113. Also, you said you wanted to get DP'ed. You must be on the wrong forum. In any event, if you find yourself in South Florida and want to race heads up, PM me. Werd. Peace out. Ice Ice Baby... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 09:59 PM | #20 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 30
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks Brian. Next mods will probably be downpipes, Akrapovic exhaust, air box mods, then bigger turbos. If weather holds out, heading to track tomorrow. Added a little more timing. Goal is to run in the 11s with a tune only. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 10:05 PM | #21 | |||
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 30
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
DonHo - Just messing with you. Would like to see your truck trap 119. Spend part of the year between NC and Florida. We don't have the weather in Florida now to run 119 or anything close. My point was that a stock X5M using launch control ran 12.7 - 12.8 @ 107 mph on every run on the same night we were running 12.0s at 113 - 114 with a tune only. |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 10:45 PM | #22 |
Private First Class
11
Rep 102
Posts |
DonHo, I'm not sure how old you are; but, I bet we have crossed paths at one point. I worked for a machine shop in Brooklyn, NY in the late 80's early 90's. I traveled a little with Jimmy LaRocca with his mustang and Mike Modeste into the mid 90's. (I was actually Mike's first sponsor.) I've been everywhere from Grand Bend Ontario to Bradenton.
I have a nitroused 88 Mustang. Best it ran was mid 9's in the 140's. It was built to take a 400 shot; but, only got it to a 200 shot before the 1st baby came. I really and trully wanted one timeslip with a 8.xx After my son was born, racing got put on the side. I still have the car; but, I have slowed it down. Last summer I took it to Raceway Park once. New plugs, fresh gas and no bottle it went 10.50's at 125. Believe it or not, it is relatively streetable. I keep thinking that a supercharger and a little work would make it a real streetable 10.00 car. I'm still working on getting that past the CFO (aka wife.) I really should not talk to either you or BMWSR. You are just going to encourage me to spend $$. I wonder how fast an X5 50i with a tune, intake, intercooler, and exhaust could go. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|