XBimmers.com | BMW X6 Forum X5 Forum
 
TireRack





Go Back   XBimmers.com | BMW X6 Forum X5 Forum > BMW X6 Forums > General BMW X6 and X6M Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-10-2009, 07:23 PM   #23
Ramos
Colonel
Ramos's Avatar
United_States
859
Rep
2,896
Posts

Drives: G20 2020 M340
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: So-Cal

iTrader: (6)

Can't you adjust the throttle sensitivity, shift points and the overall aggresiveness of the gear box like you can in an M3?
Appreciate 0
      11-10-2009, 07:43 PM   #24
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramos View Post
Can't you adjust the throttle sensitivity, shift points and the overall aggresiveness of the gear box like you can in an M3?
I don't know the setting adjustments in the M3 but the X6M has an M button which will activate the DSC, EDC, and power settings. I have them in the most aggressive setting and they're still pretty tame compared to the GTS.
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-10-2009, 08:51 PM   #25
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
60
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramos View Post
The N/A will always seem more responsive and more eager to rev, it will also always rev higher...
I think that what I was saying above. The first time I drove a X6, being unfamiliar with driving a TT, I was a little surprised that when I nudged the throttle I didn't get an instantaneous response. It came on like a ton of bricks a millisecond later, but I've always driven NA engines.

But, to analyze 997GT3’s Cayenne GTS road test, it has a very slightly better P/W ratio than the X6, of .0818 vs .0759, respectively. However, that slight advantage would hardly be noticeable. This reinforces his point that it’s more about programming the various aspects of the sporting driving experiences, such as shift points and throttle quickness. The Cayenne doesn’t use BMWs magical methods such as Dynamic Performance Control to manage the X6 proportions (weight, size height), which could also lend itself to a more direct driver experience. That could be said of the M Roadster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
But I do agree I didn't verbalize my thoughts that well because you seem to have a difficult time comprehending what I wrote.
Actually I understood what you were saying, but I was having way too much fun teasing. I apologize for teasing you about your username and for suggesting that you’re a Porsche fanatic. Clearly, you’re not a fanatic and your username is actually pretty cool.
Appreciate 0
      11-10-2009, 10:43 PM   #26
dmlgc
Lieutenant Colonel
dmlgc's Avatar
United_States
89
Rep
1,882
Posts

Drives: 2022 BMW X6MC - 335D
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlsbad, CA

iTrader: (0)

go drive whatever cayenne you are thinking about buying then go drive whatever X6 you are thinking about buying. Would be a much better approach then comparing tech specs and speculating on what BMW or Porsche might do in the future.

I might like an M3 to do a few twisties or take to the track, wouldn't want to drive on long trips. Either your a badge guy or a car guy, for a car guy it's about how it feels not what emblem is on the hood.
Appreciate 0
      11-10-2009, 11:20 PM   #27
hc7777
New Member
8
Rep
22
Posts

Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: vancouver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
I don't know the setting adjustments in the M3 but the X6M has an M button which will activate the DSC, EDC, and power settings. I have them in the most aggressive setting and they're still pretty tame compared to the GTS.
Does that mean GTS is way better than X6M in terms of driving feel? If that is the case, then why deciding between GTS and X6M is akin to the debate bet X6 50 and M.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2009, 09:41 AM   #28
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hc7777 View Post
Does that mean GTS is way better than X6M in terms of driving feel? If that is the case, then why deciding between GTS and X6M is akin to the debate bet X6 50 and M.
Not way better just different. It's a subjective thing. As I've said, the GTS is firmer and the shift points are higher. Around town the Porsche is plenty quick. A question you might want to think about is whether a super fast truck is worth a bunch more cash than merely a fast truck. What are you planning on using it for? And do you already have a fast car?
If its just to haul stuff and go on trips plus you have a smoking fast car I'd say save some money and buy a X6 5.0 or a Cayenne GTS. If not, buy a new X6M or a used Certified Cayenne Turbo S.
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2009, 04:35 PM   #29
hc7777
New Member
8
Rep
22
Posts

Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: vancouver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
Not way better just different. It's a subjective thing. As I've said, the GTS is firmer and the shift points are higher. Around town the Porsche is plenty quick. A question you might want to think about is whether a super fast truck is worth a bunch more cash than merely a fast truck. What are you planning on using it for? And do you already have a fast car?
If its just to haul stuff and go on trips plus you have a smoking fast car I'd say save some money and buy a X6 5.0 or a Cayenne GTS. If not, buy a new X6M or a used Certified Cayenne Turbo S.
GTS cost 15-20K more than X6M, thats why I stuck in bet two options that if it worth to pay more and get a less hp car but with nice handling.
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2009, 08:50 PM   #30
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hc7777 View Post
GTS cost 15-20K more than X6M, thats why I stuck in bet two options that if it worth to pay more and get a less hp car but with nice handling.
It's more? In that case the X6M all the way. In the US the GTS is cheaper than the X6M. You should shop south of the border.
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-11-2009, 10:32 PM   #31
hc7777
New Member
8
Rep
22
Posts

Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: vancouver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
It's more? In that case the X6M all the way. In the US the GTS is cheaper than the X6M. You should shop south of the border.
Well, GTS starts at a lower base price, but with some basic options, it cost more than x6m. Anyway, thanks for all your suggestion.
Appreciate 0
      11-12-2009, 09:03 AM   #32
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hc7777 View Post
Well, GTS starts at a lower base price, but with some basic options, it cost more than x6m. Anyway, thanks for all your suggestion.
Oh yes, Porsche's infamous options. Most GTS's I've seen in dealer lots are between $85-$90k. I'd say wait until the model refresh.
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-12-2009, 01:27 PM   #33
hc7777
New Member
8
Rep
22
Posts

Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: vancouver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
Oh yes, Porsche's infamous options. Most GTS's I've seen in dealer lots are between $85-$90k. I'd say wait until the model refresh.
The refresh model wont have big changes except size and hp, right? With options, GTS probably cost CA$130k-140k here. Then, X6M may be the better choice.
Appreciate 0
      11-12-2009, 08:03 PM   #34
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hc7777 View Post
The refresh model wont have big changes except size and hp, right? With options, GTS probably cost CA$130k-140k here. Then, X6M may be the better choice.
Yes but I think those changes are huge. According to some of the stuff I've read they'll cut the weight by about 400lbs and increase the horsepower by 50 in the GTS. That'll be seriously fast and more of a competitor with the X6M.
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-15-2009, 09:58 PM   #35
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Here's a little video I made so you can see them side by side.
I also went through the new iDrive menu and took the BMW up to 150(at least thats what the speedo registered)
Sorry the video is pretty lame but it should give you some idea of the differences


[u2b]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/O2fRZIOm4dA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/O2fRZIOm4dA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/u2b]
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2009, 05:28 AM   #36
hc7777
New Member
8
Rep
22
Posts

Drives: e90
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: vancouver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
Here's a little video I made so you can see them side by side.
I also went through the new iDrive menu and took the BMW up to 150(at least thats what the speedo registered)
Sorry the video is pretty lame but it should give you some idea of the differences
Ohhh............thanks!!! that really helps......

by the way, i found x6's trunk is much smaller
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2009, 02:28 AM   #37
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Here's a first stab at a video showing their relative accelerations.
If you can't read the GTech meter I got 4.1ish to 60 in the X6M and 6.0 in the GTS. I'll clean this messy video up tomorrow. I tacked my GTR on the back and it's awful because the launch knocked the camera out of focus. It did a 3.46 second 0-60.


Note: I changed the video and dropped the GTS



[u2b]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/voN04qT7czE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/voN04qT7czE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/u2b]
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor

Last edited by 991GT3; 11-21-2009 at 09:31 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2009, 10:38 AM   #38
SandmanTR
Bleeds Black and Gold
SandmanTR's Avatar
United_States
10
Rep
109
Posts

Drives: '15 M4 (Oct 6 ED) & '14 M6 GC
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Carlsbad, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 X6M  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
Here's a first stab at a video showing their relative accelerations.
If you can't read the GTech meter I got 4.1ish to 60 in the X6M and 6.0 in the GTS. I'll clean this messy video up tomorrow. I tacked my GTR on the back and it's awful because the launch knocked the camera out of focus. It did a 3.46 second 0-60.
Real nice. 4.1 seconds. I love it!
__________________

Current Ride: 2015 Slate Grey Jaguar F-Type R Coupé
Current Ride: 2014 Ruby Black ///M6 Gran Coupé
Current Ride: 2010 Alpine White X6 ///M
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2009, 12:52 PM   #39
wuyichao
Private First Class
wuyichao's Avatar
China
4
Rep
137
Posts

Drives: C63
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island, NY - Shanghai

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
Here's a first stab at a video showing their relative accelerations.
If you can't read the GTech meter I got 4.1ish to 60 in the X6M and 6.0 in the GTS. I'll clean this messy video up tomorrow. I tacked my GTR on the back and it's awful because the launch knocked the camera out of focus. It did a 3.46 second 0-60.
The GTR is insane!
__________________
09 C63 White PP/CF
10 X6M Melbourne Red
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2009, 09:40 PM   #40
991GT3
Captain
991GT3's Avatar
92
Rep
885
Posts

Drives: Ford Raptor
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Dakota

iTrader: (0)

Mea Culpa

After experimenting with acceleration I have come to the conclusion (what was obvious to everyone except me) that the Porsche is not even close to being in the same league as the X6M. My initial whine that the GTS felt faster in day to day traffic was incorrect too. I was just being stupid and hadn't compared the two properly. I had the Porsche in sport mode and the BMW in regular mode with the M button pushed. I assumed the M button would change the shift points but that was incorrect, the shift lever has to be moved over to Sport/Manual too. Once I made that adjustment the Cayenne no longer stood a chance in any way.
OP, forget about the Porsche, even if it were a Cayenne Turbo S. The M BMW SUVs are pretty much untouchable.
Note: I changed the video above and excluded the Porsche.
__________________

-2016 Macan Turbo(GF vehicle)
-2017 Ford Raptor
Appreciate 0
      11-22-2009, 12:33 AM   #41
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
60
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Interesting conclusion to your saga! Thanks.
Appreciate 0
      11-22-2009, 05:45 PM   #42
vladberca
Major General
vladberca's Avatar
Romania
763
Rep
5,560
Posts

Drives: '18 octavia 2.0 tdi dsg
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Craiova

iTrader: (0)

It is a difference of 150Hp between the models so I was surprised when u said that Porsche C GTS feels faster... I watched a compartive test on youtube and a x6 50i had the same time with a Porche C Turbo on a circuit...
Appreciate 0
      12-17-2009, 05:07 AM   #43
M3 vert
Lieutenant Colonel
M3 vert's Avatar
Canada
54
Rep
1,804
Posts

Drives: F10 M5, E93 M3, '12 750ix
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Everywhere...

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 997GT3 View Post
After experimenting with acceleration I have come to the conclusion (what was obvious to everyone except me) that the Porsche is not even close to being in the same league as the X6M. My initial whine that the GTS felt faster in day to day traffic was incorrect too. I was just being stupid and hadn't compared the two properly. I had the Porsche in sport mode and the BMW in regular mode with the M button pushed. I assumed the M button would change the shift points but that was incorrect, the shift lever has to be moved over to Sport/Manual too. Once I made that adjustment the Cayenne no longer stood a chance in any way.
OP, forget about the Porsche, even if it were a Cayenne Turbo S. The M BMW SUVs are pretty much untouchable.
Note: I changed the video above and excluded the Porsche.
Phew....I was actually thinking hard about that, but glad you got to that conclusion

The X6M is just the best overall Performance SUV out there! and IMO looks better then the X5M + Cayenne Turbo S, is newer bodystyle, lighter, looks more aggressive, and less of them on the road (which makes it highly desirable )
Appreciate 0
      12-17-2009, 05:09 AM   #44
M3 vert
Lieutenant Colonel
M3 vert's Avatar
Canada
54
Rep
1,804
Posts

Drives: F10 M5, E93 M3, '12 750ix
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Everywhere...

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmlgc View Post
go drive whatever cayenne you are thinking about buying then go drive whatever X6 you are thinking about buying. Would be a much better approach then comparing tech specs and speculating on what BMW or Porsche might do in the future.

I might like an M3 to do a few twisties or take to the track, wouldn't want to drive on long trips. Either your a badge guy or a car guy, for a car guy it's about how it feels not what emblem is on the hood.

Have you driven the M3 on long road trips?

It becomes a grandtourer on the long highways, excellent ride quality (EDC) with both 18s or 19s.

Unless you are complaining about luggage space or something then the E90 would fill that void.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.




xbimmers
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST