View Single Post
      01-06-2010, 05:48 AM   #47
artrosis
Private First Class
artrosis's Avatar
United_States
9
Rep
129
Posts

Drives: X6 ///M
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Top Secret

iTrader: (0)

That guy doing the review is a fucking retard. He's too old and not in tune with the younger generation. They need to have young people do the car reviews if you want to get accurate information; not these old crusty bastards who didnt grow up with technology.

He didnt bother to mention on TV that he was using "Ultra High Performance Summer Tires" and he did this maliciously and intentionally to make the cars performance look worse than it actually is.

The angle of the grassy hill the Range Rover drove up wasnt the same steepness as the spot the X6 was in. The part of the hill where the Range Rover drove up was flatter but was hard to tell from the angle of the shot; you can clearly see that in the video when you compare vehicle height.

They made it appear as if the Range Rover negotiated the same angle, when it didn't. The part where the Range Rover drove up was much less of an angle. They tried to drive the Range Rover up the same part as the X6 initially in an outtake, and it couldnt make it either, thats why they decided to drive it past the X6 on a lesser angle incline. In fact, neither vehicles could drive up the exact spot where the X6 was.

They also wetted down the grassy hill where the X6 was, thats why the car slid back. Range Rover paid for the promotion because the X6 is their biggest competition. People that can see through his out dated and old geezer approaches, wont buy into his euro trash car review nonsense.
__________________

Last edited by artrosis; 01-06-2010 at 06:11 AM..
Appreciate 0