View Single Post
      09-20-2010, 11:22 AM   #3
DerekS
Major
DerekS's Avatar
197
Rep
1,180
Posts

Drives: '24 X3 M Sport
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: YVR

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kief View Post
This explains it, as I noticed this at the dealer the other day. Two 2011 X5s had different MPGs printed on their stickers. I was surprised by the 17/25, b/c it wasn't that much different from my diesel that I have on order. I guess 16/23 is more realisic.
From my past experience owning a 2007 E92-335i and my current E90-335d, the difference in real world fuel economy between gas and diesel versions is greater than that expressed by EPA figures. The N54 (now N55) engine burns more fuel in city driving than was suggested by either EPA or Transport Canada. On the other hand, the 335d seems to exceed EPA ratings for highway driving and meet the ratings issued by Transport Canada.

I would expect similar differences for the gas and diesel versions of the E70. So, it is no surprise to me that the EPA has downgraded the fuel economy ratings for the E70-35i.
__________________
on order: 2024 i4 eDrive40 M Sport, Tanzanite metallic with all options
Appreciate 0