[RL18]

Another interesting comparison…

I purchased some of the continuum midranges from the newer systems out of curiosity. So far only found in the XM and I5. I wondered if there was any difference compared to the aramid fiber midranges used in all the other B&W systems prior.

Before I post all my pics, these are basically exactly the same. The only difference is in the speakers Q parameters from the use of the continuum cone. Don’t mind the difference in FS it’s basically the same, both their impedance’s peak between 125-135hz, but the continuum has a peak that’s about 10ohms lower than the aramid fiber cone. From some research online about the Q parameters (QTS, QES, and QMS) it does seem that the continuum driver requires much less dampening from the mechanical suspension and the motor has more control. From what I can gather this means the continuum midrange is more stable and accurate at peak power. This makes sense because that’s what B&W markets the continuum cone as doing. Cool!

(Continuum left, Aramid fiber right)